An ontology of hope

cognitive and blind

If you suspend your transcription on amara.org, please add a timestamp below to indicate how far you progressed! This will help others to resume your work!

Please do not press “publish” on amara.org to save your progress, use “save draft” instead. Only press “publish” when you're done with quality control.

Video duration
Not yet available
Language
English
Abstract
We define and explore two versions of hope: blind and cognitive. What's the difference between them and do we need—or can we even have—a version of those? In other words: is there hope for this world?

When bad things happen some people come up and say we should remain hopeful. Even if everything looks black and depressing and they can't really justify why—they still claim we should be hopeful.

Let's call this blind hope. Other people critique blind faith (and possibly blind hope?) as part of a middle ages style demeanor. Doesn't blind hope imply blind faith, which, in its turn, imply messianism and lack of ideology critique?

How can we remain hopeful, then, if hope doesn't make sense? This is what we attempt to address in this talk.

Talk ID
jev22-49229
Event:
jev22
Day
4
Room
HIP2
Start
11 a.m.
Duration
01:00:00
Track
E.T.I.
Type of
Talk
Speaker
Theodore Keloglou
Talk Slug & media link
jev22-49229-an_ontology_of_hope

The video is not yet available