back

Regulating Autonomous Weapons

The time travelling android isn’t even our biggest problem

If you suspend your transcription on amara.org, please add a timestamp below to indicate how far you progressed! This will help others to resume your work!

Please do not press “publish” on amara.org to save your progress, use “save draft” instead. Only press “publish” when you're done with quality control.

Video duration
00:25:56
Language
English
Abstract
Depending on the definition, autonomous weapon systems do not and might never exist, so why should we care about killer robots? It is the decline of human control as an ongoing trend in military systems and the incapacity of computing systems to „understand“ human beings and the nature of war that is worrisome.

Therefore, the envisaged military advantages come at a price as the technology raises legal, ethical, and security concerns.

The good news: Scientists and NGOs have taken up these concerns and States address the issue within the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), where a ban of the development and use of autonomous weapons is possible. The bad news: States Parties might not find a consensus for a necessary regulation.

The talk will discuss these pressing issues to support civil society in addressing the regulation of lethal autonomous weapons (LAWS).

Talk ID
9291
Event:
34c3
Day
3
Room
Saal Adams
Start
1:45 p.m.
Duration
00:30:00
Track
Ethics, Society & Politics
Type of
lecture
Speaker
Anja Dahlmann
Talk Slug & media link
34c3-9291-regulating_autonomous_weapons

Talk & Speaker speed statistics

Very rough underestimation:
146.0 wpm
833.3 spm
149.1 wpm
856.0 spm
100.0% Checking done100.0%
0.0% Syncing done0.0%
0.0% Transcribing done0.0%
0.0% Nothing done yet0.0%
  

Work on this video on Amara!

Talk & Speaker speed statistics with word clouds

Whole talk:
146.0 wpm
833.3 spm
weaponsautonomouspeopletalkhumanexampledahlmannproblemslethalinternationalkillermilitarythingssystemsquestionbitstatesmicautonomytalkingdefinitionmicrophonecontrolmachinescampaigncourseethicalrobotsbroadfindsystemlawsissuequestionsdebatehumansworkpotentialapplausewon'tweaponstuffintelligenceregardminescarschallengescommondecisionkill
Anja Dahlmann:
149.1 wpm
856.0 spm
weaponshumanautonomousstatesexampletalkcontrolpeoplemilitaryinternationalsystemtalkingdefinitionbroadsystemsproblemsrobotsstuffautonomyintelligencemachinesregardinterestinglawskillerbitissuerealcommonfindchallengeshumanspotentialcampaignngosarmslawtypelegaldiscussthreesecondthirdbasedimpressionpointforcetechnologyterminatortargeting